<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bluewave Photos &#187; smallest digital camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluewavephotos.com/tag/smallest-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluewavephotos.com</link>
	<description>All About Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

		<copyright></copyright>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>All About Photography</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
		
	
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
	<item>
		<title>Usefulness of the Smallest Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.bluewavephotos.com/usefulness-of-the-smallest-digital-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluewavephotos.com/usefulness-of-the-smallest-digital-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Glover</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy smallest digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smallest camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smallest digital camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluewavephotos.com/usefulness-of-the-smallest-digital-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which model is actually the smallest digital camera? An easy question, with a difficult answer. Digital cameras are gradually getting smaller with each new version, some of which are down to dimensions that would have been completely impossible 15 years ago. The next question would be "Are small digital cameras as viable as normal sized models?" The answer to that question is a sound yes. Ones that are around the same size as your forefinger and that can fit perfectly into the palm of your hand are as viable as regular sizes of digital camera.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluewavephotos.com/usefulness-of-the-smallest-digital-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=ignore) -->
</channel>
</rss>

